According to the OECD analysis of donors provisional 2019 ODA spend, the increase is attributable to bilateral aid to low income countries rising[footnote 23]. Data for this publication comes from the following sources: i) DFIDs ARIES database that records financial transactions relating to DFID payments and receipts. The largest increase in UMIC country-specific spend was to Lebanon (increased by 52m), followed by Colombia (increased by 15m), UK ODA to UMICs represented 13.9% of UK country specific bilateral ODA in 2019 compared to 12.4% in 2018, DFID spent 3,815 million of UK bilateral country-specific ODA - accounting for 76.2% of total UK bilateral country-specific ODA in 2019 (Figure 9), the majority of DFIDs country-specific ODA was received by LDCs or Other LICs in 2019 65.1% (2,485m), non-DFID contributors spent 1,190 million of UK bilateral country-specific ODA in 2019, a 308 million increase compared to 2018. See Annex 1 for more information on what is included in each sector level. UK climate finance spending by government department, 2011/12-2016/17. The majority of which went to the health sector, primarily for basic and reproductive healthcare, in 2019, Bangladesh was the sixth largest recipient of UK bilateral country-specific ODA, up from eighth in 2018. This is an increase of 5 million from last year, with Fiji being the largest country specific recipient. The UKs ODA spend is only slightly affected by this change as most of its ODA is issued through grants. In 2014, China's aid flows were officially estimated at over $4 billion per yearsimilar in volume to Canada or Norway, and about a third of the size of the UK's aid budget. Figure 13 provides a breakdown of sector spend by DFID and all Other Government Departments and other contributors of ODA (non-DFID). This was the largest year-on-year increase compared to the other income groups, 43.0% of spend within this category consists of project-type interventions and includes expenditure on multi-country or multi-region projects. According to a note from OECD, the top countries that donated money in 2020 are the United States, Germany, the United Kingdom, Japan, and France. IDA was replaced as the largest recipient of UK multilateral ODA by the UKs share of the EUs Development budget (referred to as EU attribution). UK aid spending reduced by 3bn, or 21%, from 2020 to 2021. This is an increase of 61 million in 2019 compared to 2018. Delivery of leadership and tax audit training to tax administration officials from developing countries. The Government also announced a one-off supplement of $304.7 million for the COVID-19 response in the Pacific and Timor . Asia remains the second largest recipient of UK bilateral ODA in 2019 with 41.8% (2,470m), followed by the Americas with 4.1% (244m), Europe with 3.2% (189m) and the Pacific with 0.3% (16m). Figures released by the Foreign Office yesterday revealed that China . The final ODA data and an updated GNI estimate are then used to calculate the final ODA:GNI ratio in the autumn publication. Dark blue = LDCs/Other LICs (Least Developed Countries/Other Low Income Countries), light blue = LMICs (Lower Middle Income Countries), grey = UMICs (Upper Middle Income Countries). Within this sector, the majority of spend in 2019 was on Financial Policy and Administrative Management (746m). In 2019, 57.6% (5,908m) of the UKs bilateral ODA was allocated to a specific country or region. Figure 16 legend: Comparing the UK ODA (billion ) spend with other DAC donor countries in 2019. Section 3 - sectoral data on education, health and water supply & sanitation plus general data on other sectors. During a consultation conducted in 2014, users told us that they use the statistics for a variety of purposes: preparing material for briefs; PQs and public correspondence; inclusion in reports and reviews and providing data for research and monitoring. The DAC sets the definitions and classifications for reporting on ODA internationally. DFID considered several factors and consulted with key stakeholders, ONS and HM Treasury when determining its approach for implementing the new framework for reporting on the ODA:GNI ratio. The President's Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 Budget Request for the State Department and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is $60.4 billion, which includes $29.4 billion for USAID fully and partially managed accounts, $1.7 billion (6 percent) above the FY 2022 Request. The increase in bilateral spend was the largest increase seen since 2016, when the UK switched to the ESA 2010 methodology for GNI estimates, 3,066 million of bilateral ODA was delivered through multilateral organisations, an increase of 294 million compared to 2018. DFIDs results estimates show what DFID has achieved in international development between 2015 and 2020. And because the economy grew in 2019, aid spending rose in line with national income from 14.5 billion to 15.2 billion an increase of 645 million (4.4%) compared to 2018. Economic Infrastructure and Services - 1,195 million (11.7%). Highlighted countries are those in receipt of UK bilateral ODA, and colours are based on amount received (dark blue=higher amounts UK Bilateral ODA received, light blue=lower amounts UK Bilateral ODA received). Section 1 - overview. In 2021, about 743 million pounds was spent on humanitarian assistance such as disaster relief, a . It includes all low, lower-middle and upper-middle income countries, except for those that are members of the G8 or the European Union (including countries with a firm accession date for EU membership). Ed Miliband, 9 June 2021. Oct 28 (Reuters) - New British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak is considering freezing the country's foreign aid budget for an additional two years, the Telegraph reported on . On 28 August, the ODA statistics team published a note on the Gross Public Expenditure statistics (GPEX). The UK is participating in the OECD DAC Peer Review process in 2019/20. This is an increase in spend (5,659m in 2018) but a decrease in terms of percentage share from 2018 (61.3% in 2018). 2019: Europe received 189 million of UK bilateral ODA in 2019, a decrease of 6 million compared to the previous year (Figure 4). For more information please see the published note which outlines a new approach in more detail and provides an opportunity for users to give feedback. Figure 4: UK Bilateral ODA by receiving region ( millions), 2009-2019. Figure 12 provides an overview of bilateral ODA by major sector in 2019, compared against 2018 spend. As a percent of . This represents 0.5% of expected gross national income (GNI) and is a reduction in aid spending from the legislative target of 0.7%. A casual observer might be optimistic about the future of Canadian aid. , Iraq = 5 per cent; India = 5 per cent; Indonesia = 2 per cent. The latest edition of this publication can be found on GOV.UK, final UK Aid spend is usually published in the autumn. In 2019, UK bilateral ODA to the region was 16 million, 0.3% of total UK bilateral ODA spend allocated to a region or country. See section 4.3.3 for information on how we estimate which countries and sectors the UK core contributions benefit, Information on the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund, In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. The vertical dashed line indicates the 0.7% ODA:GNI UN target. Note that provisional 2019 spend from other DAC donors is used in this chart. Between the spring and the autumn, the previous years ODA spending of government departments are finalised. Other = Other government departments: Department of Health and Social, Prosperity Cross-Government Fund, HM Treasury, Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, Department for Work and Pensions, Department for Education, HM Revenue and Customs, Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sports, Ministry of Defence, and Office for National Statistics, Department for International Trade. In-donor spend on support to asylum seekers and the resettlement of vulnerable people. warning that according to one estimate from the Centre for Global Development aid spending on in . News stories, speeches, letters and notices, Reports, analysis and official statistics, Data, Freedom of Information releases and corporate reports. In the Blue Book 2019, the ONS implemented a major new methodology framework for GDP, which in turn had a sizable impact on GNI. Through its donor contributions, IDA aims to reduce poverty by providing concessional loans and grants for programs that boost economic growth, reduce inequalities, and improve peoples living condition. In 2019, the UK was one of 5 DAC donors along with Denmark, Luxembourg, Norway and Sweden to either meet or exceed the UNs target of an ODA:GNI ratio of 0.7%. 4. DWP spend also includes ODA-eligible benefits to refugees within the first 12 months of stay in the UK as part of the Vulnerable Persons Resettlement (VPR) programme. , z is not applicable, 0 is null and ~ is less than half the smallest unit displayed. Developing Countries. Figure 9 legend: DFID (A) and Non-DFID (B) Breakdown of Country-Specific UK Bilateral ODA by Country Income Group, 2019. 3. This shift in share was in part driven by the decrease seen in the UKs core contributions to multilaterals as well as the actual increase in bilateral ODA spend. The portion of Gift Aid claimed by UK based international development charities that is then used on ODA eligible activities. A report from the International Development Committee said the world's poorest countries were being "short-changed" by the government as the "political . Other reasons to give foreign aid include to reward a government for behavior desired by the donor, to extend the donor's cultural influence, to provide the infrastructure needed by the donor for resource extraction from the recipient country, or to gain other kinds of . In 2019, frontline diplomatic activity (the FCOs administrative costs not included elsewhere, which are reported under FCO spend as Aid-related frontline diplomacy in support of aid flows to ) were reported at the country level compared to recent years when they were reported at the regional level. This was partly driven by frontline diplomacy, Yemen (fourth largest recipient of UK ODA in 2019) saw the largest increase in bilateral ODA spend, increasing by 56.5% from 166 million in 2018 to 260 million in 2019, surpassing the spend in 2017 (205m) (Figure 6). 17 That level of per capita spending exceeded any other OECD Development Assistance Committee (DAC) country during 2018-21. Figure 15 summarises the differences in the main sectors of 2019 UK bilateral ODA spend between countries of different income groups. The U.S. provides aid to countries that are recovering from war, developing countries, and countries that are strategically important to the U.S. The 2021 federal budget announced an additional $1.4 billion for international assistance over five years. Figure 15 legend: Comparison of sector spend for 2019 UK bilateral ODA between countries of different income groups ( million). The DAC reviews the list every 3 years. Erratic budget processes threaten US foreign aid. This is unchanged from 2018. The Biden-Harris Administration's Request is a . The first table is based on official development assistance (ODA) figures published by the OECD for members of its Development Assistance Committee (DAC). Total ODA from DAC country donors in 2019 was 119.7 billion (grant-equivalent measure), an increase from 115.1 billion in 2018. Figure 17: DAC Donors Provisional ODA:GNI Ratio, 2018 and 2019[footnote 26]. Its worth noting that, like other multilateral organisations, core contributions to IDA are based on multi-year commitments which may not be uniformly spread across years, four of the top 5 receiving organisations of UK multilateral ODA in 2019 were among the top 5 multilaterals in 2018. Because of this timing the latest estimates that are available are for 2018. You can change your cookie settings at any time. The UK ODA figures contained in this report are for 2019 ODA spending, when DFID and the FCO were separate departments, and as such, spend by these departments are reported separately. The UK was the only G7 member to cut foreign aid last year This drop in ODA, moved Nigeria from being the third largest recipient of UK country-specific bilateral ODA in 2018 to fifth in 2019 (Figure 7), Nigerias lowest position in 5 years. [2] China's Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)announced in 2013is the flagship under which China has made hundreds of pledges to support different countries and . For example, DFID contributed 112 million to the Global Partnership for Education, a multilateral organisation supporting close to 70 developing countries to ensure that every child receives a quality basic education, 11.8% was classed as Other, which includes Other Technical Assistance and Basket Funds. Over 5 years: Like the Americas, ODA spend in Europe[footnote 12] is small compared to Asia and Africa. The UK works with a wide range of organisations, for example to: respond to humanitarian need; develop infrastructure; support economic growth; or ensure that particular diseases are tackled in line with the best available evidence. DEFRAs ODA spend delivers against international climate, biodiversity and development objectives. Here are the six types of foreign aid: 1. Difference between Provisional and Final publications. For example, delivering family planning services across Malawi through an NGO, 4,939 million of UK ODA spend was delivered through core contributions to multilateral organisations. These are based on gross national income per capita published by the World Bank. Figure 9: Breakdown of DFID (A) and non-DFID (B), Country/region Specific proportion of Bilateral ODA by Region, 2015 & 2019. Despite the slight downward trend since 2015, spend is still higher than in 2012, spend to Afghanistan has fluctuated over the last 10 years. This publication is licensed under the terms of the Open Government Licence v3.0 except where otherwise stated. The nation paid 1 out of every 8 in foreign aid given by 29 major countries, figures reveal. Almost 25% of that budget has gone to just ten countries: Ethiopia ($1.13 billion) Jordan ($1.03 billion) Afghanistan . This follows a peak in 2017, in part driven by increased humanitarian assistance to conflict affected populations, South Sudan returned to the top 10 in 2019, becoming the third highest African recipient of UK bilateral country-specific ODA. From 2018 onwards, ODA has changed from being measured on a cash basis to being measured on a grant equivalent basis, following a decision taken by the DAC in 2014[footnote 3]. Figure 14: Bilateral ODA by largest Major Sector for the top 10 country-specific ODA recipients, 2019. The UK pledged to spend at least 0.7 per cent of GNI on foreign aid in 1970. The countries within the top 10 remained unchanged from 2018[footnote 25]. The fall reflected the Government's decision to reduce aid spending from 0.7% to 0.5% of Gross National Income (GNI) as a "temporary measure" in response to the pandemic's effects on the UK's public finances and economy. CSSF delivers ODA activities to tackle instability and prevent conflicts. This was partly due to an increase in Developing Country Unspecified spending in 2019. , Please see Table C6 in Excel Tables: Statistics on International Development 2019 for underlying data, From 2017, a single project could allocate spend to one or more sectors codes. Finally, the Scottish Governments Climate Justice Fund helps tackle the effects of climate change in the poorest, most vulnerable countries, with a 3m budget. For enquiries (non-media) about the information contained in this publication, or for more detailed information, please contact: Alice Marshall 2. Section 4.1 provides a detailed breakdown of ODA spending by recipient region and country; section 4.2 provides a breakdown of ODA spending by sector (for example, health or humanitarian aid); and section 4.3 provides a breakdown of ODA spending to multilateral organisations. An area of bilateral spend which increased in 2019 was DFIDs capital injection to CDC, the UKs Development Finance Institution, which increased by 266 million. See Annex 1 for more detail. FCDO is responsible for collating data and reporting spend on ODA to the Organisation of Economic Development and Co-operation (OECD), including the 0.7% ODA:GNI ratio commitment. Figure 15: Bilateral ODA by Income Group for the Major Sectors, 2019. The lighter blue represents the same measure but for ODA delivered through the Bilateral through Multilateral channel. The risk of input error is relatively low for estimates of total spend, and by country/region, and relatively higher for spending by sector (where there is sometimes ambiguity, especially for projects or programmes that cut across sectors) and by funding channel. The Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office is now responsible for producing the Statistics on International Development statistical series, the designation of National Statistics carries through to the new Department. The ODA:GNI commitment of 0.7% was first agreed internationally in 1970 by the United Nations General Assembly. Non-DAC members included in the OECD's publishing are listed separately. The central theme of 2022 was the U.S. government's deploying of its sanctions, AML . Multilateral organisations offer economies of scale in their operations and expertise, and often have the mandate and legitimacy to work in politically sensitive situations. In 2020, the most recent year for which the data is complete, military aid accounted for 23% of all foreign aid spending - the smallest share since 2004 - while economic assistance accounted . Major sectors are ordered from top to bottom by largest 2019 0DA spend. According to Full Fact, the UK spent $12.1bn on overseas aid in 2015 after the target was introduced. The UK government has been signed up to the target since 1974, but reached it for the first . Africa has consistently been the largest recipient of DFID region-specific ODA since 2010, with a share of 56.4% in 2019 (see Figure 10A), By contrast, the largest recipient of non-DFID region-specific ODA tends to be Asia (Figure 10B). We are always keen to enhance the value of these statistics and welcome your feedback either via our Statistics User Group or via email statistics@fcdo.gov.uk. Designation means the statistics carry the National Statistics label and conform to the standards summarised below. The Joint Funds are covered separately as a whole, regardless of which Government Department spends the money. In 2019 (the most recent year for which comprehensive numbers have been released), the U.S. spent over $47 billion on foreign aid - about the same as 2018 and $1 billion more than in 2017. Over 5 years: Increasing from 2015, spend to Asia reached a peak in 2016 before steadily falling by 109 million to 2,235 million in 2018. The United States is by far the largest single foreign donor. The list also states the proportion of a core contribution to each multilateral that can be counted as ODA, and is driven by proportion of ODA eligible work the multilateral carries out, The UK contribution could be used for different programmes or initiatives as well as general operations of the organisation. This was due to a rise in spending to support asylum seekers in the UK, primarily reflecting an increase in Asylum Support volumes in 2019 when compared to 2018, BEIS spent 960 million of ODA in 2019 an increase of 110 million, or 12.9%, on 2018. The estimate in 2018 and 2019 is based on published data from the European Commission on the UKs share of development expenditure. For example, Afghanistan in 2018 was in 4th position, and in 2019 is in 3rd position (a change of +1). Because the UK economy is set to get bigger over the next few years the real value of development aid spending is expected to increase. Rep.) remains a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA after entering in 2018 due to the increase in Humanitarian Aid spend, which has been the highest sector spend in the country for the last 3 years, South Sudan became a top 10 recipient of UK bilateral ODA in 2019 due to the increase in Health spend, which became the highest spend sector in the country in 2019, while Humanitarian Aid had been the highest sector for the previous 5 years, the amount of UK ODA to the top 5 multilaterals represented 68.7% of total multilateral ODA in 2019. Gross National Income (GNI) per capita below the World Bank high-income threshold defines the coverage and boundaries of the list. The portfolio aims are delivered through a mix of researcher-led and commissioned calls delivered by NIHR and through partnerships with other global health research funders, through initiatives to develop and advance global health research. Figure 11: Breakdown of UK 2019 bilateral ODA by Type of Aid. Foreign aid could be slashed to balance the books. Section 4.1 provides a detailed breakdown of ODA spending by recipient region and country; section 4.2 provides a breakdown of ODA spending by sector (for example, health or humanitarian aid); and . Tied Aid: The receiving country accepts aid with the expectation that it is spent in the lending country. . These shares are similar to 2018, UK bilateral ODA spend to the top 5 recipient countries in 2019 increased from 1,409 million in 2018 to 1,415 million in 2019. The British government has ended direct bilateral aid to more than 100 countries and territories, according to a Devex analysis of a letter written by Foreign Secretary Dominic Raab. , Finalised figures for DAC members will be published in December 2020, therefore we are using provisional figures in this chapter. In 2018, the country donated $14.2 billion. ###Bilateral ODA Spend with No Single Benefitting Country or Region. The National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Global Health Research (GHR) portfolio was established to support high-quality applied health research for the direct and primary benefit of people in low and middle-income countries (LMICs). This was an increase of 83 million compared to 2018, reflecting increased spending by FCO and DFID. The estimate for the UKs share of the EU ODA budget in 2019 is 983 million compared to 951 million in 2018. In 2019, UK bilateral ODA received by Afghanistan increased compared with 2018 to 292 million (an increase of 43m) (Figure 6). Figure 14 provides an overview of the highest spending sector for each of the top 10 recipient countries of UK bilateral ODA in 2019. To view this licence, visit nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/version/3 or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or email: psi@nationalarchives.gov.uk. These are laid out in the DAC Statistical Reporting Directives[footnote 30]. To get a sense of relative magnitude, Russian disbursements in 2015 amounted to roughly half of Italian aid that year. In 2020, Britain spent 14.5bn on foreign aid, a figure that meets the 0.7 per cent target, according to provisional data published by the Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office in April. What is the UK's overseas aid budget? This is an increase compared to 2018 when 38.7% (3,579m) of bilateral ODA was not assigned to a single benefitting country or region. Funding on research activities increased by 90 million while spending on climate-related programmes increased by 20 million, the Cross-Government Prosperity Fund spent 176 million of ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 83 million, or 88.3%, on 2018. From 2020, the ODA:GNI ratio will be calculated according to the new methodology. However, the nation has hit the 0.7 percent target each year since 2013. Germany followed with over . Correspondingly, 11 African countries featured in the UK's top 20 recipient countries. Bilateral ODA is earmarked spend, i.e. BEIS funding supports large scale mitigation projects in the following thematic areas: unlocking clean and affordable energy for all and accelerating decarbonisation, building sustainable cities and transports systems, halting deforestation and preventing irreversible biodiversity loss, helping countries and communities to become more resilient to the damaging effects of climate change. This publication confirms the UKs ODA:GNI ratio for the previous year, as well as including more detailed analysis of the UKs Bilateral and Multilateral ODA, and includes the microdata used to produce the publication. DFID spend in dark blue and non-DFID spend in grey. Aid spending was an estimated 3 billion lower in 2021 than 2020 (14.5 billion versus 11.5 This administrative source comprises 73.1% of total UK ODA in 2019, non-DFID sources, who also assess whether the spend is in line with the OECD definitions of ODA. Note that provisional 2019 spend from other DAC donors is used in this chart. The majority of non-DFID country-specific ODA was channelled to Middle Income Countries 71.5% (440m to LMICs and 412m to UMICs), LDCs and Other LICs received 339 million of non-DFID bilateral ODA in 2019, this was an increase of 112 million compared to 2018.